Empowering Smart Factories: The Role of Cyber-Physical Systems in Revolutionizing Autonomous Manufacturing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.icmri.20Keywords:
Cyber-Physical Systems, Smart Factories, Autonomous Manufacturing, Industry 4.0, IoT, Artificial Intelligence, Real-Time MonitoringAbstract
The integration of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in manufacturing is revolutionizing the transition to smart factories, enabling real-time monitoring, intelligent decision-making, and autonomous operations. CPS bridges physical processes with digital technologies, leveraging sensors, IoT, and AI to enhance efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability. This paper explores the architecture, functionalities, and transformative impact of CPS on autonomous manufacturing, highlighting innovations like predictive maintenance, mass customization, and resource optimization. Despite challenges such as cybersecurity and cost barriers, CPS holds immense potential to reshape manufacturing by fostering resilience and agility. Future advancements in connectivity and AI promise further breakthroughs in this domain.
References
[1] Abramovici M (2014) Smart products. CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering:1-5.
[2] Albrecht F, Kleine O, Abele E (2014) Planning and Optimization of Changeable Production Systems by Applying an Integrated System Dynamic and Discrete Event Simulation Approach. Procedia CIRP 17:396-391.
[3] Barthelmey A, Störkle D, Kuhlenkötter B, Deuse J (2014) Cyber Physical Systems for Life Cycle Continuous Technical Documentation of Manufacturing Facilities. Procedia CIRP 17:207-211.
[4] BaZMod consortium (2016) Component specific machine tool configuration by the use of additional cyber-physical modules. [Online]. HYPERLINK "http://www.bazmod.de/" http://www.bazmod.de/
[5] Canedo A, Schwarzenbach E, Faruque M (2013) Context-sensitive synthesis of executable functional models of cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), Philadelphia, PA, US, April 8-11, 99-108.
[6] Fraunhofer IOSB (2015) Begriffsdefinitionen rund um Industrie 4.0. [Online]. HYPERLINK "http://www.iosb.fraunhofer.de/?BegriffeI40" http://www.iosb.fraunhofer.de/?BegriffeI40
[7] Kaihara T, Kokuryo D, Kuik S (2015) A Proposal of Value Co-creative Production with IoT-Based Thinking Factory Concept for Tailor-Made Rubber Products. Advances in Production Management Systems: Innovative Production Management Towards Sustainable Growth:67-73.
[8] Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters 3:18-23.
[9] Neugebauer R, Denkena B, Wegener K (2007) Mechatronic systems for machine tools. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 56(2):657–686.
[10] Pfeiffer A, Gyulai D, Kádár B., Monostori L. (2016) Manufacturing lead time estimation with the combination of simulation and statistical learning methods. Procedia CIRP 41:75-80.
[11] Reinhart G, Geiger F (2011) Adaptive Scheduling by Means of Product-specific Emergence Data. Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability, ElMaraghy H, 347-351, ISBN: 978-3-64223-859-8.
[12] Scholz-Reiter B, Görges M, Philipp T (2009) Autonomously controlled production systems—Influence of autonomous control level on logistic performance. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58:395-398.
[13] Yoshikawa H (1992) Intelligent Manufacturing Systems Program (IMS), Technical Cooperation that Transcends Cultural Differences. University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
10.55544/sjmars
editor@sjmars.com | 
+91-8874396939
