Biometrics in the Process of Concluding and Registering Real Estate Transactions: Limits of Acceptability, Guarantees of Subject Rights, and Standards of Protection against Digital Fraud

Authors

  • Roman Sergeevich Aleshin Independent Researcher, Krasnodar Krai, Slavyansk-on-Kuban, RUSSIAN FEDERATION

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.5.8

Keywords:

biometric identification, real estate transactions, state registration, personal data, digital fraud, anti-spoofing, legal guarantees for entities, remote notarization, Rosreestr

Abstract

The introduction of biometric identification into real estate transactions creates a fundamentally new configuration of legal relations, in which the technical reliability of verification conflicts with constitutional guarantees of privacy and the legal certainty of civil transactions. The purpose of this article is to examine the legal limits of biometric identification in concluding and registering real estate transactions, analyze the system of guarantees of the rights of biometric data subjects, and develop recommendations for improving protection mechanisms against digital fraud. The methodology consists of a comparative legal analysis, a systematic literature review, and a content analysis of regulatory documents. The study identified systemic gaps in Russian legislation and proposed a proprietary model of biometric verification for state real estate registration, as well as a conceptual framework for legal regulation. The results are of interest to practicing lawyers, notaries, Rosreestr officials, and developers of state information systems in the real estate sector.

References

[1] Rosreestr. Key Results of Rosreestr's Activities in 2021 and Key Objectives for 2022. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://rosreestr.gov.ru/upload/iblock/6b5/6b519a3c7ab10d4ddefc9876096bdb36.pdf (Accessed: 15 May 2022).

[2] Bank of Russia. Key Directions for the Development of Information Security in the Credit and Financial Sector for 2019–2021. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/83253/onrib_2021.pdf (Accessed: 20 May 2022).

[3] European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206 (access date: 06/03/2022).

[4] ISO/IEC 19795-1:2021. Information technology - Biometric performance testing and reporting - Part 1: Principles and framework. – Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2021.

[5] Yang W., Wang S., Sahri N. M., Karie N. M., Ahmed M., Valli C. Biometrics for Internet-of-Things Security: A Review // Sensors. – 2021. – T. 21. – No. 18. – Art. 6163. – https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186163.

[6] Savel'ev A. I. Legal Framework for Personal Data Protection in the Digital Economy. – Moscow: Statut, 2022.

[7] Deloitte. The Future of Digital Identity. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://www.deloitte.com/na/en/services/risk-advisory/perspectives/the-future-of-digital-identity.html (accessed: June 18, 2022).

[8] Abdullakutty F., Elyan E., Johnston P. A review of state-of-the-art in face presentation attack detection: From early development to advanced deep learning and multi-modal fusion methods // Information Fusion. – 2021. – Vol. 75. – Pp. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.04.015.

[9] Kattel R., Mergel I. Estonia’s Digital Transformation: Mission Mystique and the Hiding Hand // Great Policy Successes / ed. P. ’t Hart, M. Compton. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. – Pp. 143–160. – https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843719.003.0008.

[10] Federal Ministry of Justice of Germany. Gesetz über Personalausweise und den elektronischen Identitätsnachweis. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/pauswg/BJNR134610009.html (Accessed: 24.06.2022).

[11] Woodhouse T. Biometric data and privacy law: a comparative analysis of the United States, European Union, and Australia // Computer Law & Security Review. – 2022. – Vol. 44. – Article 105643. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105643.

[12] Dubai Land Department. DLD participates in “UAE Innovates 2022” initiative. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://dubailand.gov.ae/en/news-media/dld-participates-in-uae-innovates-2022-initiative/ (Accessed: 25.07.2022).

[13] GOST R 58624.3-2019. Information technology. Biometrics. Detection of attacks on biometric presentation. Part 3. Tests and test reports. – Moscow: Standartinform, 2019.

[14] Medvedev I., Shadmand F., Cruz L., Gonçalves N. Towards Facial Biometrics for ID Document Validation in Mobile Devices // Applied Sciences. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – No. 13. – Article 6134. – https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136134.

[15] Marcel S., Nixon M. S., Fierrez J., Evans N. Handbook of Biometric Anti-Spoofing: Presentation Attack Detection. – 2nd ed. – Cham: Springer, 2019. – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92627-8.

[16] Eglitis T., Guest R., Deravi F. Data behind mobile behavioral biometrics: a survey // IET Biometrics. – 2020. – Vol. 9. – No. 6. – Pp. 224–237. – https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5174.

[17] Federal Law of July 13, 2015 No. 218-FZ "On State Registration of Real Estate".

[18] Federal Law of December 29, 2020 No. 479-FZ "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation".

[19] Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian Federation. Unified Biometric System. [Electronic resource]. – Available at: https://digital.gov.ru/activity/czifrovaya-identifikacziya/edinaya-biometricheskaya-systema (Accessed: August 11, 2022).

[20] Grother P., Ngan M., Hanaoka K. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT). Part 3: Demographic Effects. – Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2019. – NIST Interagency Report 8280. – https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8280.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

Aleshin, R. S. (2022). Biometrics in the Process of Concluding and Registering Real Estate Transactions: Limits of Acceptability, Guarantees of Subject Rights, and Standards of Protection against Digital Fraud. Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies, 1(5), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.1.5.8

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.