Assessment of Employee Stock Option Plans' Impact on the Financial Performance of Indian Construction & Infrastructure Companies
Keywords:
businesspeople, investors’, tax savings, NPS, SSYAbstract
Organizations throughout the world continue to face enormous demands due to competitive pressures to increase productivity. Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), which boost the performance and productivity of the company and its workers by retaining them to a significant degree, have also been embraced in emerging countries like India in response to the competitive challenges with industrialized nations like the USA. Employee stock ownership plans are widely used by several successful and capable businesses worldwide. The growth of the firm's performance and employee productivity may be partly blamed for the success of ESOP enterprises in nations like the USA, Japan, and the UK, among others. In recent years, these consequences have drawn increased attention from all across the globe. This paper is an empirical investigation on the effects of ESOP on the financial performance of 10 publicly traded Indian construction and infrastructure enterprises over a six-year period. Based on secondary data gathered from business annual reports of the relevant years, the research evaluates three years before to and after the introduction of ESOPs for the chosen firms. Company-wise in the chosen selection, pre- and post-ESOP adoption analysis and regression analysis are performed.
References
Blasi, J, Doughlas Kruse., Seril James, & Kruonmova Maya. (2000). Broad - based stock options and company performance: What the research tells us. Journal of Employee Ownership Law and Finance, 12(3), 34-45.
Charles-Henri D’ Arcimoles & Stephane Trebucq. (2002). The effect of ESOPs on performance and risk: Evidence from France. 11th Conference of the International Association for the Economics of Participation, Catholic University of Brussels.
Cin & Smith. (2000). Employee stock ownership and participation in South Korea: Incidence, productivity effects, and prospects. The 10th International IAFEP Conference, Italy. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1
.28.9864&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Commonwealth Department of Australia. (1999). Inquiry into employee share ownership in Australian enterprises. Available at: http://www.treasury.gov.au.
Douglas Kruse. (2018). Research evidence on prevalence of employee ownership. Available at: http://esop.com/pdf/esopHistoryAndResearch/researchEv idence.pdf.
El Marzougui Abdelaziz. (2011). Stock-options and the performance of CAC40 listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 218-228.
Employee Ownership Association. (2010). About employee ownership. Available at: http://www.employeeownership.co.uk/employee- ownership/about-employee-ownership
Employee Ownership Foundation. (2012). Annual report. Available at: http://www.employeeownershipfoundation.org/pdf/EOFA R12_5.3.13.pdf.
KPMG Survey. (2011). Employee stock options/ Equity incentives. Industry Insights, pp.1-20. Available at www.kpmg.com/in.
Kumar B Rajesh. (2004). Effects of ESOPs on performance, productivity and risk. IIMB Management Review, pp.9-20.
Reggie Martes. (2012). Employee ownership and firm performance: The performance of employee owned firms in Europe. Master Thesis, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University. Available at: http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=127923.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.