Impacts of Mixing on Anaerobic Composting and Enhancing Biogas Recovery

Authors

  • Raunak Pantl Department of Biology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA.
  • Deepanshi Singh Department of Biology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA.
  • Aman Kumar Department of Biology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA.

Keywords:

cow dung, anaerobic digestion, biogas production

Abstract

The effectiveness of cow dung for biogas production was investigated, using a laboratory scale 10L bioreactor working in batch and semi-continuous mode at 53oC. Anaerobic digestion seemed feasible with an organic loading of up to 1.7 kg volatile solids (VS)/L d and an HRT of 10 days during the semi-continuous operation. The averaged cumulative biogas yield and methane content observed was 0.15 L/kg VS added and 47%, respectively. The TS, VS and COD removals amounted to 49%, 47% and 48.5%, respectively. The results of the VS/TS ratio showed very small variation, which denote adequate mixing performance. However, there was some evidence of ammonia inhibition probably due to the uncontrolled pH employed. The data obtained establish that cow dung is an effective feedstock for biogas production achieving high cumulative biogas yield with stable performance. The future work will be carried out to study the effect of varying organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of cow dung in a semi-continuous mode.

References

Harikishan S. Sung S. 2003. Cattle waste treatment and class-A biosolid production using temperature-phased anaerobic digester. Advances in Environmental Research. 7: 701-706.

Li R., Chen S. and Li X. 2009. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production. Energy Sources. 31: 1848-1856.

Lopes W. S., Leite V. D. and Prasad S. 2004. Influence of inoculum on performance of anaerobic reactors for treating municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology. 94: 261-266.

American Public Health Association. 1998. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 15th Ed. Washington, APHA, USA.

Nopharatana A., Pullammanappallil P.C. and Clarke W.P. 2007. Kinetic and dynamic modelling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste management. 27: 595-603.

Chen Y., Cheng J.J., and Creamer K.S. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology. 99(10): 4044-4064

Sadaka S. and Engler C. 2000. Effects of mixing on anaerobic composting of beef manure. In: Proceeding of ASAE Annual International Meeting, Technical papers: Engineering Solutions for a New Century, 9-12 July, pp. 4993-5001.

Rao M.S., Singh S.P., Singh A.K. and Sodha M.S. 2000. Bioenergy conversion studies of the organic fraction of MSW: assessment of ultimate bioenergy production potential of municipal garbage. Applied Energy. 66: 75-78.

Bujoczek G., Oleszkiewicz J., Sparling R. and Cenkowski S. 2000. High solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. J. agric. Engng. Res. 76: 51-60.

Angelidaki I. and Ahring B.K. 1993. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: The effect of ammonia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38: 560-564.

Nielsen H.B. and Angelidaki I. 2008. Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition. Bioresource Technology. 99: 7995-8001.

Chae K.J., Yim S.K., Choi K.H., Park W.K. and Lim K. 2011. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Sung-Hwan farm-scale biogas plant in Korea. http://www.kriegfischer.de/texte/farm scale%20biogas%20plants.pdf

Castrillon L., Vazguez. I., Maranon E. and Satre H. 2002. Anaerobic thermophilic treatment of cattle manure in UASB reactors. Waste Management and Research. 20: 350-356.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Pantl, R., Singh, D., & Kumar, A. (2022). Impacts of Mixing on Anaerobic Composting and Enhancing Biogas Recovery. Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies, 1(6), 14–18. Retrieved from https://sjmars.com/index.php/sjmars/article/view/30