Flipped Classroom Approach in Learning Taxonomy
Keywords:
Assessment, flipped classroom, lecture method, performance, motivation, learningAbstract
One of the abilities required for the digital age is scientific literacy. It consists of understanding and knowledge of scientific concepts and techniques necessary for personal decision-making. Observing, categorizing, measuring, inferring, forecasting, communicating, and employing spatial and time linkages in learning taxonomies are examples of basic science process abilities. This present study used a quasi-experimental research design and purposely selected the STEM students as the participants in the experimental group (Flipped Classroom Approach) and control group (lecture method). The data were treated with t-test and ANOVA. As a result, the flipped classroom approach intentionally promotes students' needs that are matched with independent learning, constructivism, and student-centered teaching strategies. According to the findings of this study, both males in the control and experimental groups did equally well in an evolutionary relationship and systematics based on scored performance, however, females in the control group outscored females in the experimental group. According to proponents of self- determination theory, gender is one of three demands that are crucial to human psychology and transcend other social biological aspects. Hence, to measure learning performance is to seek to know the scales as the factor that motivates students in flipped classrooms and lecture method groups to learn. Thus, the researcher sought to measure the level of motivation of students. With the use of an improvised Motivation Learning Questionnaire to assist the theory's basic premise, which had three psychological demands drive students motivation: autonomy, competence, and or belongingness of students in comparison to lecture method and flipped classroom strategy. On the other hand, self-efficacy in learning style, specifically in relation to student motivation, was investigated in this study However; the result proved that there was a highly significant difference in the scaled motivation of students in the lecture method in intrinsic goal orientation, control of learning beliefs, and self-efficacy. However, the extrinsic goal orientation, task value, and instructor assistance showed no statistically significant differences. Hence, students excelled in learning performance in flipped classroom approach but the extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning beliefs, and self-efficacy made students in lecture method more motivated.
References
Bandura, A., & Jeffrey, R. W. (1973). Role of symbolic coding and rehearsal processes in observational learning. J. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 26, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034205
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2009). Remixing Chemistry Class: Two Colorado Teachers Make Vodcasts of Their Lectures to Free Up Class Time for Hands-On Activities. International Society for Technology in Education, 36(4), 22–27. http://www.iste.org
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110. https://miami.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/differentiating-autonomy-from- individualism-and-independence-a-se-2
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well- being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
Fowler, S. (2007). The Motivation to Learn Online Questionnaire (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 1--26. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148. https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/fowler_kevin_s_201805_phd.pdf
Groenendijk, T, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2013). The effect of observational learning on students’ performance, processes, and motivation in two creative domains. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02052
Gundlach, E., Andrew, K., Richards, R., Nelson, D., & Bristol, C. L. (2015). A Comparison of Student Attitudes, Statistical Reasoning, Performance, and Perceptions for WebAugmented Traditional, Fully Online, and Flipped Sections of a Statistical Literacy Class. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(1). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10691898.2015.11889723?needAccess
Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Community College Student Voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
Kaptan, K., & Timurlenk, O. (2012). Challenges for Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 763–771. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812033757
Linn, M. C. (2001a). Science Education. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13668–13673. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02441-4
Linn, M. C. (2001b). Science Education. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13668–13673. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02441-4
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for future research. A Critical Review of Flipped Classroom Challenges in K-12 Education: Possible Solutions and Recommendations for Future Research, 12(4), 13–22. https://telrp.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2.pdf
Okit, J. L. (2019). Flipped Classroom Approached. Enhancing the Academic Performance and Motivation of Senior High School Students. Https://Www.Grin.Com/De/. https://www.grin.com/de/
Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, January, 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Robins, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer US, January, 149–172. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278716228_A_Self- determination_Theory_Perspective_on_Student_Engagement
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 54–67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X99910202
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. APA Educational Psychology Handbook, 1, 13–27. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-
03687-002
Turiman, P., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(October), 110–116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812036944
van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (210 C.E.). Science Teacher Education. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), 712–718. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080448947006825
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.