Effect of Layer Thickness and Printing Orientation on Tensile Strength of Parts Printed by FDM

Authors

  • Kanwarjeet Singh Assistant Professor, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, Wazirpur Campus, Delhi, INDIA
  • Gaurav Arora Assistant Professor, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, Wazirpur Campus, Delhi, INDIA
  • Pankaj M. Tech. Scholar, Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University, Wazirpur Campus, Delhi, INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.2.1.8

Keywords:

Additive Manufacturing, Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM), Build Orientation, Layer Thickness, Mechanical Properties

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is and advanced production process that develops the product by depositing layer on layer from a CAD data. Out of all available techniques of Additive Manufacturing, Fused Deposition Modelling is one of the popular and widely used approach for fabricate thermoplastic parts. The present research work involves the development of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) parts utilizing FDM process by varying the thickness of depositing layer and build orientation. The tensile strength of the fabricated samples were evaluated. The results revealed that a maximum tensile strength is shown by the part having a layer thickness of 0.20 mm with horizontal build orientation.

References

[1] Hull, C. W. (1984). Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. United States Patent, Appl., No. 638905, Filed.

[2] Gebhardt, A., Hötter, J. S., Gebhardt, A., & Hötter, J. S. (2016). Basics, definitions, and application levels. Additive manufacturing, 1-19.

[3] Prashar, G., Vasudev, H., & Bhuddhi, D. (2023). Additive manufacturing: expanding 3D printing horizon in industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(5), 2221-2235.

[4] Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6: 239–242.

[5] Manogharan, G. (2014). Hybrid manufacturing: analysis of integrating additive and subtractive methods. North Carolina State University.

[6] Williams, C. B., Mistree, F., & Rosen, D. W. (2011). A functional classification framework for the conceptual design of additive manufacturing technologies.

[7] Abdulhameed, O., Al-Ahmari, A., Ameen, W., & Mian, S. H. (2019). Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(2), 1687814018822880.

[8] Jadhav, A., & Jadhav, V. S. (2022). A review on 3D printing: An additive manufacturing technology. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62, 2094-2099.

[9] Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., & Hou, L. (2013). Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. The International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 67(5), 1191-1203.

[10] Tiwari, S. K., Pande, S., Agrawal, S., & Bobade, S. M. (2015). Selection of selective laser sintering materials for different applications. Rapid prototyping journal, 21(6), 630-648.

[11] Petruse, R. E., Puşcaşu, S., Pascu, A., & Bondrea, I. (2019). Key factors towards a high-quality additive manufacturing process with ABS material. Materials Today: Proceedings, 12, 358-366.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Singh, K., Arora, G., & Pankaj. (2023). Effect of Layer Thickness and Printing Orientation on Tensile Strength of Parts Printed by FDM. Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies, 2(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.55544/sjmars.2.1.8

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): February Issue

Section

Conference Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Stallion Journal for Multidisciplinary Associated Research Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.